Methods, scope, corrections
Separate announced from binding.
Every nuclear × large-load deal, its structure, its contractual weight, and what changed, in one free place.
Inclusion rule
We include publicly announced fission deals between a nuclear power provider and a named large-load buyer or developer. Announcements without a named counterparty are excluded. Fusion agreements are excluded from v1 so the technology field stays comparable.
Methodology
Each material figure points to a source entry that states what it supports. Primary sources take priority: company releases, SEC filings, and regulator dockets. Trade press can identify a lead, but never stands alone behind a number. Firm and optioned capacity remain separate in the data and interface.
Corrections
Open a GitHub issue with the deal id, the proposed correction, and a primary source. Issues serve as the tip line. Accepted changes enter the public changelog.
Open an issuePublished verbatim
Bindingness rubric
- B0
- Rumored / reported, no party confirmation
- B1
- Announced intent, MOU, LOI — non-binding
- B2
- Development agreement / feasibility funding — money moving, no binding offtake
- B3
- Binding offtake or definitive agreement (signed PPA, energy purchase, funded order)
- B4
- Binding + physical/regulatory progress (construction, licensing milestone secured)
- B5
- Operating — electrons flowing under the deal
- BX
- Dead, lapsed, or superseded (keep the row; the graveyard is data)